US President Donald Trump claimed he was asked by both Iran and Israel to mediate peace talks. In response, he proposed a ceasefire, aiming to bring some calm. However, despite this announcement, violence has continued, and uncertainty still looms over the future of international relations.

Meanwhile, global powers have started reacting strongly. Russia’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Vassily Nebenzia, sharply criticized Washington’s actions, stating, "The US has opened a Pandora’s box." He warned of serious global consequences if the conflict continues to escalate.

With fears of a possible World War III, many people are asking the same question: If the worst happens, where could you go to stay safe?

According to The Metro, here are some countries that could be safer due to their neutral policies, remote locations, or peaceful records:

Antarctica

One of the most remote places on Earth, Antarctica’s isolation and distance from major powers make it less likely to be involved in war. But survival here is tough due to extreme cold and a lack of resources.

Iceland

A peaceful country with no history of major wars, Iceland’s remote location keeps it away from most conflict zones. While it may still experience some impact from global fallout, it remains one of the calmest regions globally.

New Zealand

Ranking second on the Global Peace Index, New Zealand is known for its neutral stance and rugged geography, which could help protect it in times of war. It has supported Ukraine financially but hasn’t taken a military role in global conflicts.

Switzerland

Famous for its neutrality during World War II, Switzerland remains neutral even today. Its strong defence infrastructure, mountain terrain, and nuclear shelters make it a secure spot.

Greenland

With just 56,000 people and a remote location, Greenland is far removed from likely war zones. Its lack of major military involvement reduces its chances of being a target.

Indonesia

Indonesia’s non-aligned foreign policy and its emphasis on world peace make it a less likely participant in global wars. Its geographic location also keeps it out of immediate danger.

Tuvalu

This tiny island nation in the Pacific, home to just 11,000 people, is geographically isolated and has very limited military value, making it an unlikely target during global conflict.

Argentina

Known for its vast agriculture, Argentina could still grow food even in a nuclear winter. Its resources and neutral foreign policy give it the potential to be a survival-friendly country in crisis times.

Bhutan

Bhutan has stayed neutral since 1971, protected by its mountainous location and landlocked geography. Its small size and peaceful culture keep it far from international threats.

Chile

Chile’s long coastline and stable infrastructure make it a strong contender for safety. It’s one of South America's most developed nations, with plenty of natural resources.

Fiji

Located 2,700 miles from Australia, Fiji’s dense forests, small population, and peaceful diplomacy offer a quiet retreat from global tension. Its army is minimal and largely symbolic.

South Africa

With a good mix of natural resources, fresh water, and agricultural land, South Africa is well-positioned to handle a crisis. Its strong infrastructure and varied landscape make it relatively self-sufficient.


You might also be interested in - Iran nuke threat ends: Israel agrees to truce, Netanyahu thanks Trump