Why is Kenya killing a million Indian crows?

Originally introduced to Zanzibar in the 1890s to manage garbage, the Indian crows, also known as Corvus splendens, has spread widely across East Africa over the past century, now causing significant problems.

These crows have become pests in Kenya, impacting local wildlife, raiding food from tourist buffets, attacking chicks in poultry farms, and even causing risks at airports due to bird strikes. In response to their increasing numbers and increasing problems, the Kenyan government recently announced plans to eliminate a million crows by the year’s end. This effort includes using licensed poison imported by hoteliers and employing traps and catapults to manage their population

The Invasion of the Indian Crows

The Indian crow, also known as the house crow (Corvus splendens), is native to the Indian subcontinent. It was introduced to Kenya in the late 19th century, likely through ships that travelled between the regions. Initially, the crows were confined to coastal areas, but over the decades, they have spread inland, thriving in urban and suburban environments.

The adaptability and intelligence of Indian crows have allowed them to outcompete native bird species for food and nesting sites. Their omnivorous diet means they consume a wide variety of foods, from human waste to small animals, further impacting local ecosystems. The crows’ presence has led to a significant decline in native bird populations, some of which are now endangered.

Ecological Impact

The ecological impact of Indian crows in Kenya is profound. They are known to raid the nests of native birds, consuming eggs and young chicks, which directly reduces the populations of these birds. Additionally, the crows’ aggressive behavior displaces other species, further disturbing the ecological balance.

Indian crows also contribute to the spread of diseases. Their scavenging habits expose them to various pathogens, which they can then transmit to humans, livestock, and other wildlife. This has raised public health concerns, especially in densely populated urban areas.

Economic Consequences

Beyond ecological damage, Indian crows have caused economic harm in Kenya. They are notorious for raiding crops, leading to significant agricultural losses. Farmers in affected regions have reported substantial damage to their fields, as the crows eat seeds, fruits, and grains. The financial burden of these losses is considerable, affecting the livelihoods of many rural communities.

In urban areas, the crows’ scavenging has exacerbated waste management problems. They tear open garbage bags and scatter waste, creating unsanitary conditions and increasing the cost of waste collection and disposal. This has prompted local governments to take more stringent measures to control the crow population.

Government Action

In response to the escalating problems, the Kenyan government has decided to cull a million Indian crows. This decision was not made lightly; it followed extensive consultations with environmental experts, conservationists, and community leaders. The culling process involves the use of baited traps and poison, which has raised ethical concerns among animal rights activists.

The government defends its decision by emphasizing the need to protect native species and ensure ecological balance. “This is not just about killing birds; it’s about preserving our biodiversity and protecting our economy,” said Dr. John Kamau, a wildlife conservation expert involved in the culling program. “If we do not act now, the damage could become irreversible.”

Ethical Concerns and Opposition

Despite the government’s rationale, the culling program has faced significant opposition. Animal rights groups argue that killing the crows is inhumane and that alternative, non-lethal methods should be explored. They suggest options such as sterilization, relocation, and public awareness campaigns to reduce human practices that attract the crows.

“Mass culling is a short-term solution that does not address the root cause of the problem,” said Mary Wanjiku, a spokesperson for a leading animal rights organization. “We need to look at sustainable, humane methods to manage the crow population.”

The decision is to use Starlicide, an avicide similar to what is used against European Starlings in America. This decision has been controversial. This substance takes effect within 10 to 12 hours after ingestion by crows, and it breaks down safely, leaving the carcasses poison-free.

Ashwin Viswanathan from the Nature Conservation Foundation in India explains that the house crow, which is closely related to the Indian crow, is prevalent across most human settlements in India due to its adaptability and cultural significance.

The spread of Indian crows beyond India has largely occurred through global trade and deliberate introductions. They are now found in various parts of the world, including Europe, West Asia, Australia, and the Americas, highlighting their adaptability and success in new environments.

The issue of invasive species, like the Indian crow, is a global concern for human activities. Despite international efforts and laws to manage these invasive species, their proliferation continues to give rise to ecological challenges worldwide.

A study published in Nature Communications highlights the significant impact of global trade on the spread of invasive species. The paper notes that a third of all initial introductions of invasive species occurred between 1970 and 2014, reflecting the acceleration in global trade and human movement over the past century.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) contains a comprehensive Global Invasive Species Database, which includes various invasive species like the giant African land snail, the Asian glossy starling, the common myna, lantana bushes, the cane toad, and the Asian tiger mosquito. These species have thrived in new environments, often better than native species and disrupting ecosystems.

You might also be interested in – Crowd Burns Parliament: What sparked Kenya’s brutal protests?