People who work remotely all the time produce less than half the greenhouse gas emissions of office workers, according to a new study.

Employees in the US who worked from home all the time were predicted to reduce their emissions by 54%, compared with workers in an office, the study found. But hybrid workers did not reduce their emissions so dramatically, according to the research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Researchers from Cornell University and Microsoft examined five categories of emissions, including office and residential energy use, to model the predicted greenhouse gas emissions of office workers, remote workers, and hybrid workers in the US. The datasets they used included Microsoft's own employee data on commuting and teleworking behaviors.

They discovered that the use of communications and information technologies had a minimal effect on people's work-related carbon footprints.

Less office energy usage and a shorter drive each day were the key factors in remote employees' lower emissions.

Working from home has broader benefits for decreasing emissions, such as reducing traffic during rush hour in commuter zones, which is expected to increase fuel efficiency. But the authors cautioned that in order to offer advantages for reducing emissions, working from home needs to be properly organized.

During the COVID-19 epidemic, remote employment soared. By 2022, more than half of employees indicated they could work from home at least once a week, and 35% said they could do so full-time. Since 2019, the number of flexible work arrangements has increased by up to 10 times.

Five aspects of work were studied in the current study across three work scenarios: working entirely remotely, on a mixed schedule, or entirely onsite. They examined information and communication technology use, home and office energy consumption, commuter and non-commuter travel, and residential and office travel.

In comparison to completely onsite employees, they discovered that entirely remote employees might have a carbon footprint that is more than 50% lower. Hybrid arrangements also have certain advantages since they have a carbon footprint that is between 11% and 29% lower than completely onsite staff.

The work-from-home impact can be diminished by certain considerations, according to the authors. Staying at a distance might ease traffic congestion in densely populated places, which has the potential to cut emissions. However, relocating from densely populated to less densely populated locations may mean lengthier commutes for hybrid workers. While remote work plainly reduces the need for office space, non-commuter travel actually increases as more days are spent at home.

Nevertheless, the research provides a strong indication that, when used carefully, a remote work environment might have a less negative effect on the environment.

In their studies, Cornell University's authors came to the conclusion that while remote work has the potential to reduce carbon footprint, it must be carefully considered in relation to commuting habits, building energy use, vehicle ownership, and travel that is not directly related to work.

Job seekers in India participated in the study, and it revealed that flexibility

Employees in India aren't keen to return to a five-day workweek like they had before the outbreak, even as employers throughout the world are starting to support return-to-office programs. According to a recent poll by the employment website Indeed, 71 percent of Indian professionals place a high value on flexibility.

Over 1,200 job seekers in India participated in the study, and it revealed that flexibility "includes the ability to work from home, set your hours, and take breaks as needed," according to CNBC Make It.

We have unjustly been stigmatized in popular culture as homebodies who look for any justification to stay indoors.

A LinkedIn research, however, has debunked this unpleasant myth. According to the survey, while Indians are increasingly conscious of the need to strike a healthy work-life balance, many of them prefer working in an office setting than working remotely. Approximately 1,001 employees took part in the poll. A little more than 78% admitted they chose to go to work. However, they share the same need to preserve a consistent work-life balance and a separation between the two. Please, no 'work-life integration'!

Please, also have a look into : Pune startup takes on India’s mosquito menace with a sustainable, eco-friendly solution