Congress files privilege motion against Union Education Minister
Rejecting Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge’s charge against the government, Pradhan emphasized that the Preamble remains a crucial part of NCERT textbooks.
![Congress files privilege motion against Union Education Minister 1 111683813](https://thetatva.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/111683813-780x470.webp)
The recent controversy surrounding the alleged misleading NCERT preamble removal from NCERT textbooks has intensified significantly, sparking a heated debate in Parliament. This debate involves Congress General Secretary and Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh and Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. The dispute has not only raised questions about the accuracy of educational content but also about the broader implications for how the Constitution’s values are represented in Indian schools.
Privilege Motion and Accusations
Jairam Ramesh has filed a privilege motion against Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, accusing him of making misleading statements regarding the exclusion of the Preamble from NCERT textbooks. Ramesh claims that Pradhan’s assertions are factually incorrect and misleading. He presented evidence showing that older editions of Class 3 NCERT textbooks included the Preamble both at the beginning and the end, contradicting Pradhan’s statements about its removal.
The evidence Ramesh provided includes several textbooks from recent years. Specifically, he referenced the November 2022 editions of the Class 3 Environmental Studies textbook ‘Looking Around’ and the Hindi textbook ‘Rimjhim,’ as well as the December 2022 edition of the Class 6 textbook ‘Honeysuckle.’ These editions included the Preamble, suggesting that its exclusion in newer editions represents a significant and controversial change.
![Congress files privilege motion against Union Education Minister 2 Misleading NCERT Preamble Removal](https://thetatva.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-20-3.jpg)
In his notice of question of privilege, Ramesh highlighted the omission of the Preamble in the June 2024 edition of the Class 3 textbook ‘Our Wondrous World’ and the Hindi textbook ‘Veena.’ This shift has fueled accusations that the current government is deliberately altering educational materials to downplay the significance of the Constitution’s Preamble.
Government’s Response and Defense
In response to the privilege motion and the Congress party’s accusations, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan has strongly denied claims of misleading NCERT Preamble removal. Pradhan has accused the Congress party of spreading misinformation and misleading the public. He emphasized that the Preamble remains an integral part of the NCERT curriculum, despite the changes in recent textbook editions.
Pradhan defended the government’s stance by pointing out that recent textbooks have expanded coverage of constitutional subjects. He argued that the new Class 6 textbooks include more comprehensive discussions on the Preamble, Fundamental Duties, Fundamental Rights, and the National Anthem compared to previous editions. According to Pradhan, these changes reflect a broader commitment to the Constitution and its values, rather than a deliberate attempt to omit them.
Pradhan also criticized Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge’s allegations, accusing him of Misleading NCERT preamble removal accusations and creating unnecessary controversy. He asserted that the Modi government remains committed to upholding the Constitution and ensuring that its principles are adequately represented in the educational curriculum.
The Broader Implications
The controversy over the alleged misleading NCERT Preamble removal highlights several critical issues regarding educational content and political influence. The removal of the Preamble from textbooks, if proven true, raises questions about the role of educational materials in conveying constitutional values to young students. The Preamble is a fundamental part of the Constitution, outlining the guiding principles and objectives of the Indian state. Its inclusion in textbooks is seen as essential for fostering an understanding of these values among students.
The dispute also underscores the importance of transparency and accuracy in the curriculum development process. Changes in educational content, especially those related to constitutional and historical subjects, should be handled with care and clarity to avoid misconceptions and misinformation.
Additionally, the ongoing debate reflects broader concerns about the influence of political considerations on educational policies. The clash between the Congress party and the Union Government reveals how political disagreements can impact perceptions of educational integrity and the representation of constitutional values.
As the controversy with respect to “misleading NCERT preamble removal” continues, it remains to be seen how it will affect future textbook revisions and the overall approach to including constitutional principles in educational materials. Both the Congress party and the Union Government have staked their positions, and the outcome of this dispute could have lasting implications for how constitutional values are taught in Indian schools.
The misleading NCERT Preamble removal controversy not only raises questions about specific educational content changes but also highlights broader concerns about the role of politics in shaping educational materials. As the debate unfolds, the public will be watching closely to see how these issues are resolved and what impact they might have on the future of education in India.
You might also be interested in: NCERT Introduces 10 ‘Bagless Days’ for Classes 6-8 to Foster Practical Learning