Delhi assembly to debate Kejriwal’s future amid ED summons

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal yesterday presented a motion of confidence in the Delhi Assembly amid speculation of his potential arrest and allegations by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) that the BJP is attempting to topple his government.

Kejriwal highlighted recent developments, including repeated summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an excise policy case. He expressed concerns about potential efforts to undermine his administration, citing claims from two MLAs who allege being approached by BJP members with offers of money to defect.

“Two MLAs approached me, stating that BJP members offered them Rs 25 crore each. They were informed that Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal would be arrested, and the government would be overthrown,” Kejriwal said in the assembly.

The Chief Minister further raised concerns about alleged attempts by the BJP-led central government to poach AAP MLAs, drawing comparisons to “another Operation Lotus,” a reference to previous political maneuvers. He asserted his stance that the ED investigation into the excise policy lacked merit and maintained his innocence.

“We observe that in other states, political parties are being fragmented, and governments are being toppled by filing false cases. In Delhi, they are planning to arrest AAP leaders under the guise of a liquor policy case,” said the AAP chief, highlighting the political motives behind the ongoing probe.

The Delhi Assembly is scheduled to discuss the motion of confidence tomorrow, February 17th. This discussion will provide an opportunity for lawmakers to voice their support or opposition to Kejriwal’s government.

In response to Kejriwal’s allegations, the Delhi Police’s crime branch issued a notice requesting his participation in the investigation into the alleged poaching attempt. The notice additionally seeks details regarding the AAP MPs purportedly approached for defection.

Kejriwal is also due to appear in court tomorrow following a complaint filed by the ED citing his repeated non-compliance with summonses. The court ordered his appearance on February 17th and said that he was “legally bound” to comply to its order.

You might also be interested in – Why farmers are angry from Berlin to Delhi? Unveiling the common thread