The Supreme Court of India has rejected demand to postpone NEET-PG exam, which is scheduled for August 11. The plea was made because some candidates said they were given exam centers in cities that are very hard to reach. The court's decision affects about two lakh students who are set to take this important exam.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, along with Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, firmly stated that the NEET-PG exam will proceed as scheduled, despite the petitioners' request. The bench articulated that deferring the exam for a few individuals would disrupt the plans and preparations of a large number of other students. CJI Chandrachud emphasized, "We cannot put the careers of two lakh students in jeopardy for five students."
The petitioners, represented by senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, argued for rescheduling the exam, citing the difficulty of having two separate sessions within a single day. They highlighted that having an exam in the morning followed by another in the afternoon posed significant challenges for the candidates. Despite these arguments, the court maintained its position, underscoring the need for a stable and predictable examination schedule.
The bench noted that requests to postpone exams are increasingly common and emphasized that such decisions should not be made lightly. They stressed that the world is not perfect and that they are not academic experts. The CJI further stated that any postponement would have far-reaching implications, impacting many students and their families who have already made extensive preparations for the exam.
Impact of the Decision on Candidates
The plea also highlighted that the exam centers were only allocated on July 31, with the centers themselves to be announced shortly thereafter. This short notice added to the inconvenience faced by the candidates, who now find themselves with limited time to adjust their travel plans.
Originally, the NEET-PG exam was scheduled for June 23 but was postponed by the Union Health Ministry due to reported irregularities in other competitive exams. This delay was intended to address concerns about fairness and transparency in the examination process. However, the subsequent decision to not postpone the exam further underscores the importance of adhering to the planned schedule.
The Supreme Court's ruling emphasizes the necessity of maintaining a fixed schedule for critical examinations like the NEET-PG. The court's decision ensures that the majority of students can continue with their preparations without additional disruptions. This stance highlights the importance of fairness and consistency in the examination process, ensuring that the integrity of the examination schedule is preserved.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's decision to reject the plea to postpone the NEET-PG exam reflects a commitment to upholding the established examination timeline. By choosing not to delay the exam, the court aims to minimize disruptions for the majority of students and maintain the examination's integrity. The ruling underscores the need for fairness and consistency in handling such crucial assessments, ensuring that all students are provided with a level playing field.
Furthermore, the court’s decision highlights the challenges faced by examination authorities in managing logistical issues and ensuring fairness across a broad spectrum of candidates. It reflects a broader trend in which judicial bodies are cautious about intervening in academic scheduling, emphasizing the importance of consistency and stability in examination processes. This ruling serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in organizing large-scale exams and the need for all stakeholders to prepare adequately and plan in advance.
The Supreme Court's ruling not only impacts the immediate situation for NEET-PG candidates but also has broader implications for how such issues will be managed in the future, reinforcing the necessity of maintaining orderly and predictable examination schedules.
You might also be interested in - NEET-UG 2024: SC rules out ‘systemic breach’ in exam, says leak limited