The National Medical Commission (NMC) of India has recently attracted attention by reinstating contentious definitions of sodomy and lesbianism as "unnatural sex offenses" in a newly published textbook for undergraduate medical students. This action has ignited considerable debate and concern among healthcare professionals, advocates for LGBTQ+ rights, and human rights organizations.

The amended curriculum, particularly in the areas of forensic medicine and toxicology, has reignited discussions on subjects that were previously eliminated in 2022 following a ruling from the Madras High Court. The court had called for a more progressive stance in medical education, which included the removal of stigmatizing terminology related to sexual orientation and practices. Nevertheless, the NMC's recent modifications seem to reverse many of these progressive strides, reinstating outdated and potentially detrimental classifications of sexual behavior.

Unnatural Sex Offenses
Image Source: en.wikipedia.org

The revised curriculum not only categorizes sodomy and lesbianism as unnatural but also revisits discussions surrounding the hymen, virginity, and defloration, highlighting their medico-legal implications. Critics argue that these topics are presented in a manner that could perpetuate negative stereotypes and biases against LGBTQ+ individuals, thereby undermining efforts to promote inclusivity within medical education.

Contentious topics in the new guidelines issued by the NMC

Sexual Perversions: The curriculum addresses an array of sexual behaviors such as fetishism, sadism, voyeurism, exhibitionism, transvestism, and necrophilia, yet it conspicuously excludes any reference to consensual sexual practices among queer individuals.

Medico-Legal Framework: Students are required to familiarize themselves with the legal competencies associated with several laws, including the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). However, the curriculum does not distinguish between consensual activities and criminal offenses, potentially fostering misunderstandings regarding LGBTQ+ relationships.

Removal of Disability Training: Additionally, the revised curriculum has removed a seven-hour training module focused on disability, prompting concerns from disability rights advocates about insufficient education on this vital aspect of healthcare.

The NMC has justified its decision by asserting that the modifications are part of an outcome-oriented curriculum that aligns with international standards, to produce an "Indian medical graduate" who possesses the requisite skills and values. They contend that it is crucial to reevaluate current regulations to accommodate evolving societal norms and expectations.

Nevertheless, the response has been immediate and pronounced. Critics contend that the reintroduction of these subjects may reinforce detrimental attitudes towards marginalized groups, especially the LGBTQ+ community. Medical professionals and advocates have voiced concerns that such a curriculum could obstruct advancements in fostering understanding and inclusivity within the medical profession. They stress that medical education ought to mirror modern perspectives on gender and sexuality, rather than reverting to outdated and stigmatizing classifications.

You might also be interested in - Lesbian, bisexual women face higher mortality risk due to ‘toxic’ social stigma, study finds