US President Donald Trump has warned of possible new trade tariffs on India over its continued purchase of crude oil from Russia. The statement has added fresh tension to trade and diplomatic ties between India and the United States, especially at a time when global energy markets remain unstable.

Trump said that countries buying large amounts of Russian oil are indirectly helping Moscow at a time when many Western nations are trying to pressure Russia through economic measures. He claimed that if India continues importing discounted Russian crude, the US could consider imposing higher tariffs on Indian goods. According to him, such steps would be taken to “protect American interests” and push partners to align with US foreign policy goals.

India, however, has defended its position. Indian officials have repeatedly said that the country’s first responsibility is to ensure affordable energy for its people. After the Ukraine war began, Russian oil became available at lower prices, helping India manage inflation and fuel costs. New Delhi has also made it clear that its oil purchases follow international rules and are based on national interest, not political alignment.

Experts say the tariff threat, if implemented, could affect sectors like textiles, pharmaceuticals, engineering goods, and IT-linked exports. The US is one of India’s biggest trading partners, and any trade restriction could impact businesses on both sides. At the same time, analysts point out that such tariffs could also raise costs for American consumers and companies that rely on Indian imports.

Diplomatic observers believe India is unlikely to change its energy policy under pressure. Instead, New Delhi may push for dialogue and stress its independent foreign policy. India has maintained relations with both Western countries and Russia, calling for peace and diplomacy rather than taking sides.

The situation shows how global politics, energy security, and trade are closely linked. Whether Trump’s warning turns into actual policy will depend on future political decisions, but for now, it has reopened debate on how far major powers can influence each other’s economic choices.